Renthal Fatbar 35 and Apex 35 stem review
The products mentioned in this article are selected or reviewed independently by our journalists. When you buy through links on our site we may earn an affiliate commission, but this never influences our opinion.

Renthal Fatbar 35 and Apex 35 stem review

Renthal's Fatbar gets fatter and lighter

Our rating

4

195.00
160.00

Published: September 26, 2016 at 9:00 am

Our review
The same shape and ride quality as the 31.8mm bar and stem, but with more width at a lower weight Buy if, You loved the Fatbar but want to go fatter and lighter

Pros:

Lighter than the regular Fatbar and wider too; same great shape and ride feel we’ve come to expect from Renthal

Cons:

Apex stem requires careful fitting

Renthal was so happy with the balance and feel of its 31.8mm diameter bars that it was reluctant to adopt the new 35mm ‘standard’. So why the change? Well, our 40mm-rise Fatbar 35 weighs just 299g — that’s 66g lighter than the 31.8mm equivalent, despite it being 20mm wider at 800mm.

The wider the diameter of a tube, the greater its stiffness-to-weight ratio. Renthal has used this knowledge to make the 35mm Fatbar lighter, not stiffer — it didn’t want it to feel harsher than the 31.8mm version. Cut down to 780mm for comparison, we couldn’t feel any difference between the two, with the Fatbar 35 proving exceptionally comfy on long, rocky descents.

The bar’s aggressive angles (seven degrees of backsweep, five of upsweep) feel spot on to us, encouraging a more aggressive riding position than the eight to nine degrees of backsweep found on many bars.

Our 40mm Apex 35 stem is 1g heavier than its 31.8mm equivalent, at 118g. Both are among the lightest in class, but require careful fitting. Greasing the bolts before installation and torquing them up precisely when installing is essential.

  • Bar: £70 / US$85 / AU$130
  • Stem: £90 / US$110 / AU$160
Product "50736" does not exist or you do not have permission to access it.